"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2008/9/2 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> BTW, there are actually two separate issues here: input parameters and >> output parameters. After brief thought it seems like we should enforce >> uniqueness of non-omitted parameter names for IN parameters (including >> INOUT), and separately enforce uniqueness of non-omitted parameter names >> for OUT parameters (including INOUT).
> It's well thought, but I afraid so this can hide some bug, and it's > little bit dangerous. > I thing, so we can simply duplicate values in result then allowing > duplicate params in function. Um ... what? I'm not sure what behavior you're proposing here. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers