Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And I think that's backwards. Why can we only use a feature once every
> OS out there implements it? We still run on systems that don't have SSL
> support. LC_TYPE settings are not portable between systems, yet that
> doesn't bother anyone. Why should we have a problem with collate
> settings not being portable?
If we're going to approach it that way, we need a syntax for CREATE
COLLATION that doesn't hard-wire what the possible collation modifiers
are.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
