On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think what the hash index patch really needs is some performance > testing. I'm willing to take responsibility for the code being okay > or not, but I haven't got any production-grade hardware to do realistic > performance tests on. I'd like to see a few more scenarios tested than > the one provided so far: in particular, wide vs narrow index keys and > good vs bad key distributions.
> If anyone is willing to do comparative performance testing, I'll > volunteer to make up two variant patches that do it both ways and > are otherwise equivalent. I can happily through some hardware at this. Although "production-grade" is in the eye of the beholder... > regards, tom lane > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
