I wrote:
> * the psql command seemed to have some ideas about supplying a blank
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION command for a nonexistent function, but this
> didn't actually work. In any case it seemed poorly thought out, because
> you'd really need to pay some attention to *why* the regproc/regprocedure
> lookup failed. I just ripped it out for the moment. I'm not averse to
> the concept, if you can get it implemented properly.
While I was out at dinner, the obvious solution presented itself: define
\ef with no argument as being the command that presents an empty CREATE
FUNCTION command template to fill in. This isn't any more or less
typing than where I think you were going, and it eliminates all the
ambiguity about whether you meant to type a nonexistent function name
or just mistyped.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
