"Alex Hunsaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hrm, I thought if anything we wanted to put them in pg_constraints (at
> least inherited ones). Now maybe I have defaults confused with NOT
> NULLs... But don't we want to be able to give defaults names and and
> such?
No, I think you're thinking of NOT NULL. There's no reason to have
names for defaults that I can see.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
