On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:44:19 +0100 Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 15:05 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > j and m happen to be two of those that are available. > > > > I honestly don't have a terribly strong opinion about what it > > should be called. I can live with jobs or multi-threads. > > Perhaps we can use -j for jobs and -m for memory, so we can set memory > available across all threads with a single total value. > > I can live with jobs or multi-threads also, whichever we decide. > Neither one is confusing to explain. > Memory? Where did that come from. Andrew is that in your spec? Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
