On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 14:52 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 14:42 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> Having > >> one column named reset_val and one named boot_val should work, no? > > > > Yes, those names seem very appropriate to me. > > > > Finding the reset_val isn't that tough, IIRC the way the guc assignment > > works with its "doit" flag.
> I haven't looked at the code.. but there is actually a field in the > struct called reset_val. It may not be usable, or you may have just > missed it? Yah, missed it. Cool, even easier ;-) -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
