I've used select count(), then a select LIMIT/OFFSET for the pages.. A
cursor might be a better idea though I don't think you can get the total
number of rows without count()'ing them.
Good luck!
-Mitch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hackers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 5:07 AM
Subject: [HACKERS] Portal question
> Hi all,
>
> This is the situation: You are doing a big query, but you want the
results
> on the web page to be paginated. ie. The user can click page 1, 2, etc.
>
> So, you need know how many rows total would be returned, but you also only
> need a small fraction of them.
>
> What is an efficient way of doing this?
>
> It seems to me that using a CURSOR would be advantageous, however once a
> CURSOR is opened, how do you get the full row count?
>
> ie. Can you do this:?
>
> 1. Declare a cursor
> 2. Find the total number of rows returned
> 3. Fetch the subset of the rows that are required
> 4. Construct a pagination based on the info from 2 and 3.
>
> If this can't be done - how do you do it? Is the only way to repeat the
> whole query twice, the first time doing a count(*) instead of the select
> variables?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
