On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi, > > Le mardi 30 septembre 2008, Heikki Linnakangas a écrit : > > pg_relation_size() doesn't include the size of the FSM. Should it? I'm > > thinking "no", but pg_total_relation_size() should. > > What's practical about pg_relation_size() and pg_total_relation_size() as > of > 8.3 is that the diff is the cumulated indexes storage volume. Your proposal > makes it harder to get this information, but sounds good otherwise. > Would it be possible to add in some new APIs to? > a. pg_relation_size() > b. pg_relation_fsm_size() > c. pg_relation_indexes_size() > d. pg_total_relation_size() = a + b + c You forgot the toast size. Best regards, -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
