"Robert Haas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I'm just grumpy because I can't see a way to do the
>>> patch-on-patch-on-patch that I'll need to make this all work for Nov 1.
>>> So big patch here we come. But that's just the way it is and I'll stop
>>> honking about it.
>>
>> This is one of the problems that DVCSs are supposed to solve ... have
>> you tried Git?
> I think the other problem here is that the difficulty of getting the
> patch landed increases more than linearly with its size.
Yeah. Tools aren't really the key problem there IMHO.
I agree with Simon that it would be a good thing if this patch got
landed before he went on to the next part. But personally I'm a bit
burned out from commitfest and am not eager to go take a third look
at the patch right now. Does anyone else want to review it?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
