Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wonder if we could piggy-back on guc parameters.
God, no. GUC is hopelessly complex already, we should *not* try to make
it track different values of a parameter for different tables.
Attaching a reloptions-like column to pg_tablespace might not be
unreasonable ... but I think that has little to do with Alvaro's
immediate problem.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
