All, I was discussing WITH RECURSIVE the other day, and realized that one thing which we're not getting with this patch is a simplest-case simple syntax which 75% of users are looking for. You know, the ones with simple proximity trees who just want to find all children of one parent.
Would it be a worth it for us to implement a non-standard simple syntax sugar on top of WITH RECURSIVE? Or, at least, something like CONNECT_BY()? -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL San Francisco -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
