> > > > Can you see a scenario where a programmer would forget to delete the
> > > > data from pg_largeobject and the database becoming very large filled
> > > > with orphaned large objects?
> > >
> > > Sure. My point wasn't that the functionality isn't needed, it's that
> > > I'm not sure vacuumlo does it well enough to be ready to promote to
> > > the status of mainstream code. It needs more review and testing before
> > > we can move it out of /contrib.
> > >
> >
> > IIRC vacuumlo doesn't take the type lo(see contrib/lo) into
> > account. I'm suspicious if vacuumlo is reliable.
>
> This was my round about way of asking if something to combat this issue
> can be placed in the to do list. :)
Added to TODO:
* Improve vacuum of large objects (/contrib/vacuumlo)
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
