2008/10/11 Dimitri Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > Le 11 oct. 08 à 01:50, Tom Lane a écrit : >> >> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>> It seems that the real way forward is to improve on that patch. >> >> Yeah. If the schema-per-module answer were really a good answer, >> we'd have done it before now. > > I tried to spend some time thinking about those issues and came up with a > packaging management proposal, which I still think has merits. One of them > is to propose to reuse existing stuff and Tom Dunstan's preliminary work. > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-07/msg01098.php >
did you look to SQL/PSM standard? Regards Pavel Stehule > Hope this helps, > - -- > dim > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkjwmCQACgkQlBXRlnbh1bmIggCdGqD8TwJE7CeZDCL+v5njPtib > 4+kAoLVj3rDzsFpJvb/Zc20R+Jo/s5Z7 > =O6C6 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
