Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 11:36:19AM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
Yes, unfortunatelly.
No one replied to my proposed design:
http://marc.info/?l=pgsql-hackers&m=122222470930544&w=2
FWIW, I didn't know what to say about that proposal because I still
don't know what problems any of this is trying to solve. Perhaps I'm
just obtuse (and people should feel free to ignore me, since I'm not
volunteering any code anyway); but this entire discussion seems to me
to lack clear statements of what the goals of the effort are.
I previously summarized this here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-09/msg01067.php
Your list is quite similar, so at least our understandings seem to
converge. :-)
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
