Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 17:44 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> That's been "extended with an epoch counter" per the docs; I don't think
>> that's appropriate for the new functions, is it?
> I assumed it was, so you can subtract them easily.
> It can be done either way, I guess. Happy to provide what people need. I
> just dreamed up a few that sounded useful.
I don't think you should be inventing new functions without clear
use-cases in mind. Depending on what the use is, I could see either the
xid or the txid definition as being *required*.
In any case, do not use the wrong return type for the definition you're
implementing.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
