Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's nothing to do with confusing commit/abort.
> The new way of doing things on commit is to subcommit then commit. This
> sequence is repeated during WAL replay. If we crash, it will try to
> repeat the sequence, so in some cases it will try to set status to
> subcommitted on a transaction already marked as committed.
Hmm, but then why did we not see the same thing before?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
