>>> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > How about >> > something like "suppress_no_op_updates_trigger"? > > I think it means something to us, but "no op" is a very technical phrase > that probably doesn't travel very well. Not everybody Majored in Comp > Sci and speaks Amglish as their native language. > > Certainly this intention is much better than "minimal", but a more > widely acceptable phrase is probably better. I will avoid trying to come > up with something myself though. How about one of these?: suppress_same_value_updates_trigger suppress_no_change_updates_trigger suppress_no_effect_updates_trigger They all seem a bit awkward, but the best that came to mind. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
