"Jonah H. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Greg Stark
>> In what way is fadvise a kludge?
> non-portable, requires more user-to-system CPU, ... need I go on?
I'd be interested to know which of these proposals you claim *is*
portable. The single biggest reason to reject 'em all is that
they aren't.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
