Ron Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... I was somewhat surprised that the bitmap cost estimates didn't > also change much. Wouldn't the estimated # of data blocks > read for the bitmap be roughly the same as for the index?
By definition, a bitmap scan's cost isn't affected by index order
correlation.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
