On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 12:34 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm happy with the idea of a readahead process. I thought we were > > implementing a BackgroundReader process for other uses. Is that dead > > now? > > You and Bruce seem to keep resurrecting that idea.
Actually just asking for status, not trying to change design. > I've never liked it -- I > always hated that in Oracle and thought it was a terrible kludge. But now... If you have a better way, great, but that doesn't make perfectly workable and fairly simple userspace solutions into kludges. That's just an emotive description of your preference. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
