Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 08:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> What about using the existing >> syscache logic to re-derive inval information from watching the update >> operations?
> That does sound possible, but it makes some big assumptions about > transactional machinery being in place. It ain't. Subtransactions make > everything about 5 times more difficult, so it seems pretty scary to me. Um. Yeah, subtransactions would be a PITA. Never mind that then ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers