Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Return the count of tuples processed, probably as a long since that's > what the input limit-count is. There are potential overflow issues with > this definition on 32-bit machines, though that's not going to affect > functions.c since it passes a limit of 1 tuple in the cases where it > needs to examine the result, and no one else presently cares at all. > But the possibility of overflow might limit the usefulness of this > definition in other scenarios.
And what would that mean for a cursor which was read forward and backward? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
