Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > [Also there is a comment saying "this is a bug" in autovacuum.c > > Are we thinking to go production with that phrase in the code?] > > Yeah, well, it's only a comment ;-) The problem is that a worker can > decide that a table needs to be vacuumed, if another worker has finished > vacuuming it in the last 500 ms. I proposed a mechanism to close the > hole but it was too much of a hassle.
I just committed a patch that should fix this problem. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
