On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 23:28 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 17:37 -0500, Greg Stark wrote: > > > There are a lot of comments in the code which imply that vacuuming is > > not implemented but in fact from what I can see it is -- sort of. It > > does rewrite the bitmap in bmbulkdelete but it doesn't have to rebuild > > the index from scratch. Are the comments out of date or am i > > misunderstanding them or the code? How complete is the vacuum > > implementation? > > As I understood it, complete.
Looking at the code, it looks like my understanding was complete-ly wrong and your comments seem accurate. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
