Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Also included is a perl version of the script created by a2p >> and fixed by me. Unfortunately a2p did not generate working code, so I guess >> eventually we have to only work with the perl version. I guess a perl hacker >> can beautify the script quite a bit. > > We should probably standardize on the perl version, ugly or not, because > otherwise we'll have a difference in build process between Unix and > Windows machines. Personally I don't really care how ugly it is as long > as no one has to look at it ;-) ... but if someone wants to beautify the > perl script they're surely welcome to do so.
+1. > A few notes: > > * before committing we need to see the proposed diffs to the Makefiles > and the Windows build scripts. It might be worthwhile to make it as a perl module, called from the commandline in Unix and just included directly in the win32 build scripts. But someone more perly can comment on if that's a prettier way or not:-) //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
