Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you have a proposal for a different API, or do you just want to > improve the comment for the function? Bear in mind that a lot of the > callers do know the string length, and so we shouldn't impose an > unnecessary strlen() operation on those cases.
We already have the following comment, so I think a new comment is not needed. | In the case of no conversion, src is returned. Since Assert() is not available in the case, developers should use the function carefully after all. My patch might be fixed, too... | "Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows" | http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
