Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 19:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> The reason I was thinking about heap_lock_tuple is that it might provide >> a suitable defense against that case.
> OK. Lock tuple works OK, but its the unlock that I'm worried about. How > would non-transactional un-lock tuple work? I was imagining that the heap_inplace_update operation would release the lock. Is there some problem with the concept? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers