Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Since fnmatch and the #define's are supposed to be provided by
>>> <fnmatch.h>, I think you should probably put the substitute definitions
>>> in a substitute fnmatch.h, not port.h, to avoid that risk.
> 
>> Do we have an example where we do that before? I assume there is some
>> autoconfy way to make that include file only "appear" in the include
>> path if the system one doesn't exist or is broken?
> 
> Not really.  I'd suggest making the callers do something like
> 
>       #ifdef HAVE_FNMATCH
>       #include <fnmatch.h>
>       #else
>       #include "port/pg_fnmatch.h"
>       #endif

How's that actually different from the
#ifdef HAVE_FNMATCH
#include <fnmatch.h>        <-- happens in fe-secure.c
#else
#define ....                <-- happens in port.h
#endif

If HAVE_FNMATCH isn't set, we still have the same problem, no?

//Magnus

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to