Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The attached patch changes pg_settings.enumval to be an array of text
>> instead of just a string, per previous discussion and the open items list.
> 
>> Comments?
> 
> Hmmm ... this coding will fail if any enumval contains a double quote.
> Which is probably not a big problem, but we ought to document the
> restriction somewhere.

Hmm. Know what, I had a code comment about that in there. Then I
re-factored my patch and lost it!

I think a code comment is enough. It would actually be quite silly to
*have* a double quote in an enumval - I doubt it will happen by misake.

Will add back.

> Also, this:
> 
>> !    if (len > strlen(separator)-1)
>> !            /* Replace final separator */
>> !            hintmsg[len-strlen(separator)] = '\0';
> 
> would read better IMHO as "if (len >= strlen(separator))".

Pfft, result of too much copy/paste. Changed.


> Also, the output datatype should be text[] not cstring[].


Ok, will change. That requires hardcode of 1009? Or should I a #define
to pg_type.h?

//Magnus

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to