On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 04:11:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 09:06:13PM +0100, Zdenek Kotala wrote: > >> I takes 2.6 second on my laptop. I think it is not so bad. > > > About 2.0 on my OS/X laptop. Could this be a problem on whatever > > architecture/OS/compiler combo you have? > > Not everyone is using fast new laptops.
Possibly not, but this could be a way to flush out inconsistencies among floating point units or, more importantly, implementations of NUMERIC. > This is a cool hack, agreed, but that doesn't make it a useful > regression test. Whatever value it might have isn't going to repay > the community-wide expenditure of cycles. What's the slowest it runs? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
