Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've already modified your patch a bit ... please send your updated
> patch so I can merge it into mine.  However, my changes were also
> relatively minor.  Since Tom wants it to be entirely rewritten then
> maybe merging minor fixes to it is a waste of time ...

The thing I'm complaining about is having dropped the intermediate
struct that represents the fully decoded set of reloptions.  If you
put that back I won't object to a table-driven approach to doing the
decoding.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to