On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I don't think so, because this section of code is only called if there > is redo to perform. If no redo, we never get here. > > OK. But why not open up the database for read-only access when there is no redo action to be done ? Or am I missing something trivial ? Anyways, I will wait for your latest version to continue with the test/review. Thanks, Pavan -- Pavan Deolasee EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
