Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I think the reason we've avoided putting such stuff into include/port/ >> is that right now that directory consists exclusively of OS-specific >> files. Maybe we need another include subdirectory? > > I think the idea is rather that you don't need to change call sites to > include the system header or our own. The symlink approach I mentioned > earlier might work.
Anything that needs symlinks will need a set of workarounds on Windows, having us manually do a copy of the files. We already do this in a couple of cases, but relying more on it would make things even more kludgy I think... //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
