Alvaro Herrera escribió: > The only thing I'm now missing is SnapshotResetXmin(). It currently > looks like this:
> After the patch we don't have any way to detect whether resowner.c has > any snapshot still linked to. I assume there's no objection to adding a > new entry point in resowner.c for this. Hmm, that doesn't readily work because there's no way to track transaction boundaries in resource owners. I think I'll have to add a separate static counter in snapmgr.c that's maintained by the calls from resowner.c. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
