Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Well, considering how seldom new pages will be added to the visibility
map, it seems to me we could afford to send out a relcache inval event
when that happens. Then rd_vm_nblocks_cache could be treated as
trustworthy.
A relcache invalidation sounds awfully heavy-weight.
It really isn't.
Okay, then. I'll use relcache invalidation for both the FSM and
visibility map.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
