"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well they can still talk to the port of course but its irrelevant
>> because unless they have an ssh key, they aren't getting in. Period.
> Well, they weren't getting in before ... i twas the massive flood of attempts
> that was hurting :)
Yeah. So having a more secure login API won't help that a bit.
I don't have a problem with moving the ssh support to a nonstandard
port, but I do have a problem with the lack of notification about it.
Even core found out the hard way.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
