On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hm. People have complained of that fact from time to time in normal > usage as well. Should we simply change SIGINT handling to allow it to > cancel an idle transaction?
If this means that we would be able to able to easily rollback the current transaction of a backend stuck in "idle in transaction" status, a big +1. -- Guillaume -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
