Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> * This seems to be still mostly NetBSD code, so I think you need to do >>> more than just credit them in an aside. Should we repeat the full >>> NetBSD copyright notice for this one function? > >> Do you mean the >> * Copyright (c) 1989, 1993, 1994 >> * The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >> * >> * This code is derived from software contributed to Berkeley by >> * Guido van Rossum. > >> part, or the whole licence? Since the licence is the same as ours, doing >> that seems like overkill. > > Well, it does say > > * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright > * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. >
Right, maybe we'd better do that even if it's identical to our own. Better credit too much than not enough. I'll put the whole thing in - will move the function to the bottom of the file as well to clearly isolate which parts it's referring to. //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
