> > But, as Simon pointed out, is it really worth the risk? PITR is closer > to a physical process, and it's probably wise to just assume it's not > portable. >
Yeah...I am getting that impression ;-). From this I will assume we need: - same OS (and OS minor version?) - same CPU architecture I was hoping it was a simple set of requirements, but that's life. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 03 5330 3171 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ | http://www.rhyme.com.au <http://www.rhyme.com.au/> | / \| | --________-- GPG key available upon request. | / |/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
