Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Greg Stark wrote: >> One concern I have about this is people asking "how come when I >> runvacuum manually it takes x minutes but when autovacuum runs it it >> tale 5x minutes?"
> As long as the default is the same, people would get at least an initial > clue that it might have something to do with them changing a > configuration parameter... It seems like mostly a confusion-generator to me. Is there any actual evidence that autovac should use a different maintenance_work_mem than other processes? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers