Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg Stark wrote:
>> One concern I have about this is people asking "how come when I
>> runvacuum manually it takes x minutes but when autovacuum runs it it
>> tale 5x minutes?"
> As long as the default is the same, people would get at least an initial
> clue that it might have something to do with them changing a
> configuration parameter...
It seems like mostly a confusion-generator to me. Is there any actual
evidence that autovac should use a different maintenance_work_mem than
other processes?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
