Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it worse to suffer from additional query overhead if you're sloppy with > the tuning tool, or to discover addition partitions didn't work as you > expected?
Surely that's the same question we faced when deciding what the Postgres default should be? That and the unstated other question "Is someone more likely to use partitions without reading the manual or not use partitions without reading the manual about the down-sides of constraint_exclusion (in the partitioning section....)" -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
