Simon Riggs wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 14:39 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

For a solution that doesn't depend on the file-based log shipping, I think we'll need a way for the standby to request a certain starting point for the streaming when it connects. When the standby starts, it would first recover all the log segments it can obtain using recovery_command, and then connect to the primary and request to start streaming from where recovery_command stopped.

That was already suggested and rejected because it introduces a
potentially unacceptable delay in the start of synch replication - for
large databases this could be hours. (I should add it was suggested by
me and I now accept that it should be rejected.)

I don't understand that argument. If the standby is missing say 100 log files, it's not up-to-date with the primary until it has somehow obtained and replayed all those log file. It doesn't make any difference whether it obtains them over the wire via walreceiver, or via an archive. Until it has obtained and replayed all those files, it's not up-to-date, and a failover would lead to data loss.

Or did I misunderstand what "start of synch replication" means? Got a pointer to the previous discussion?

--
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to