David E. Wheeler wrote:
Perhaps not, but I have to say, looking at Robert's JSON example:
SELECT json(r.foo AS foo, r.bar AS bar, r.baz AS baz, r.bletch AS
quux) FROM rel r;
I would be pretty confused. It looks exactly like the proposed syntax
for named parameters. So while syntactically they may never be used
together, there's a semantic mismatch, IMHO.
In my mind, you just have to think about it hard enough to come to
realize that, when viewed from the right angle, the semantic conflict
might not exist after all. It's a bit tricky, but I think it's possible.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers