Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes: > On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 19:07 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> ISTM one could make a pretty good argument that this last case should >> succeed, producing an empty-array argument.
> We had a similar discussion before, and you replied here: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2008-07/msg00150.php > Are you now in favor of allowing zero arguments for a variadic > parameter? No, not as such (at least not now that I've had a chance to digest the alternatives). The default-parameter mechanism gives us another solution tool, but if you don't use a default then the same ambiguities as before still exist. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
