"Mark Wong" <mark...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> "Mark Wong" <mark...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>>> Are any of the queries complicated enough to trigger GEQO planning?
> Sorry for the delay in responding, here's the queries and the number
> of tables in each:
> [ worst case is ]
> Q8: 8 (7 uniqie) + 1 temp table
Well, geqo_threshold is 12 by default, so that theory loses ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
