"Mark Wong" <mark...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> "Mark Wong" <mark...@gmail.com> writes: >>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>> Are any of the queries complicated enough to trigger GEQO planning?
> Sorry for the delay in responding, here's the queries and the number > of tables in each: > [ worst case is ] > Q8: 8 (7 uniqie) + 1 temp table Well, geqo_threshold is 12 by default, so that theory loses ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers