On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 09:22 -0500, Greg Stark wrote: > I'm confused shouldn't read-only transactions on the slave just be > hacked to not set any hint bits including lp_delete?
They could be, though I see no value in doing so. But that is not Heikki's point. He is discussing what happens on the primary and the effects that must then occur on the standby. He has rightly pointed out a (pluggable) hole in my logic. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
