2008/12/22 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > "Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tan...@gmail.com> writes: >> 2008/12/21 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >>>> WindowAgg? >>> >>> WindowAgg seems like a winner to me, because it draws a parallel to >>> the regular Agg node type, which seems valid unless I've completely >>> misunderstood what's happening... > >> I disagree with WindowAgg. The aggregates are subset of window >> functions in the node, though much code is similar and ported from >> nodeAgg. > > So? If Agg does a subset of what WindowAgg does, all the more reason > to use that name. >
OK. I thought WindowAgg means some kind of subset of Agg, but if it means Window (And) Agg then it makes sense to me. Regards, -- Hitoshi Harada -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
