On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:18 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 23:32 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> >>> Simon Riggs escribió: >>> >>>> Please let me know how I can make the reviewer's job easier. Diagrams, >>>> writeups, whatever. Thanks, >>> >>> A link perhaps? >> >> There is much confusion on this point for which I'm very sorry. >> >> I originally wrote "infra" patch to allow it to be committed separately >> in the Sept commitfest, to reduce size of the forthcoming hotstandby >> patch. That didn't happen (no moans there) so the eventual "hotstandby" >> patch includes all of what was the infra patch, plus the new code. >> >> So currently there is no separate "infra" patch. The two line items on >> the CommitFest page are really just one large project. I would be in >> favour of removing the "infra" lines from the CommitFest page. > > I think it's useful to review the "infra" part of the patch separately, so I > split it out of the big patch again. I haven't looked at this in detail yet, > but it compiles and passes regression tests.
Super! I would fix synch rep code based on this patch. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers