Thomas Lockhart writes: > Are dollar signs currently allowed in operators? I'd hate to reduce the > allowed number of characters for operators. They are, therefore identifiers couldn't start or end with a dollar in any case. However, single "$" operator cannot exist, so foo$bar wouldn't be ambiguous, but the tendency to confuse it with an operator syntax would reduce the readability of code greatly, IMO. However, a $$ operator can exist, so a construct like foo$$bar would parse completely differently, leaving you with a big mess. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- [HACKERS] Re: Dollar in identifiers Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Gilles DAROLD
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Jan Wieck